NISSMAT

Misuse of Technology – Impact on Privacy of Users

Video Library

Misuse of Technology – Impact on Privacy of Users

Duration: 1:34:59Published: August 19, 2021

What this session covered

This webinar, part of the institute's regular series, examined how the misuse of modern technology bears on the privacy of individuals. Following an opening address that set out the recognition of privacy as a human right and its constitutional standing in India, two invited speakers each delivered a presentation — the first an academic specialising in law, policing and technology, the second a senior advocate — after which a moderated question-and-answer session drew in several participants. The opening remarks noted the existence of the Information Technology Act of 2000 and its later amendment, subordinate rules made in 2011, and a data protection bill then under consideration, while observing that the adequacy of the legal framework for protecting personal data remained a matter of debate.

The first speaker approached the subject through the lens of travel and movement, arguing that everyday technologies — from vehicle systems and satellite navigation to biometric passports — deliver safety and security while simultaneously creating traces that can compromise privacy. Drawing on established definitions of privacy and on the distinction between safety and security, the presentation suggested that technology need not be deliberately misused to erode privacy, since ordinary use leaves data that may be exploited if it falls into the wrong hands. It considered how the events of 2001 reshaped attitudes to security screening and the sharing of passenger data between jurisdictions, the tension between data protection regimes and cross-border information sharing, and the way restrictions on movement during the pandemic increased reliance on the internet. The speaker also touched on emerging challenges posed by drones and other advancing technologies.

The second speaker traced the origins of the concept of privacy through literature and early legal history, before examining several prominent episodes of surveillance and data misuse, including the disclosures associated with a former intelligence contractor, the Cambridge Analytica affair, and the Pegasus spyware allegations then before the Supreme Court of India. The presentation reviewed the Indian statutory framework, a 2017 judgment recognising privacy as a fundamental right, and the personal data protection bill then pending in Parliament, arguing that its early passage would strengthen protection against the misuse of technology. In the discussion that followed, participants raised the difficulty of enforcing privacy protections across national borders, the limits of domestic law where offenders operate from other jurisdictions, and the case for international cooperation; further exchanges touched on corporate espionage, the protection of children's privacy, and the practical limits of the so-called right to be forgotten.

Key points raised

  • The session framed privacy as a recognised human right with constitutional standing in India, noting a 2017 Supreme Court judgment that recognised it as a fundamental right.
  • One speaker argued that everyday technologies used for travel and movement can compromise privacy even without deliberate misuse, because ordinary use leaves exploitable data traces.
  • The discussion reviewed high-profile episodes of surveillance and data misuse, including the Cambridge Analytica affair and the Pegasus spyware allegations then before the Supreme Court of India.
  • The Indian statutory framework was surveyed — the Information Technology Act of 2000 and its amendment, rules made in 2011, and a data protection bill then pending — alongside the argument that the bill's passage would strengthen protection.
  • In the question-and-answer session, participants highlighted the difficulty of enforcing privacy protections across national borders and made the case for international cooperation.
  • Further exchanges considered corporate espionage, the privacy of children, and the practical limits of the right to be forgotten.
Share